Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] - #749

Closed
ClarusIubar wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt/naver-marker-array-allocations-7651686478409747793
Closed

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement]#749
ClarusIubar wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt/naver-marker-array-allocations-7651686478409747793

Conversation

@ClarusIubar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What: Refactored useNaverTourismMarkers.ts to eliminate multiple intermediate array allocations (from chained .map().filter() and array spreads) during the marker reconciliation loop. These were replaced with single-pass for...of loops and explicit arrays/Sets/Maps assignment.

🎯 Why: During frequent map interactions like panning and zooming, the marker materialization hook recalculates visibility. Creating intermediate arrays on every viewport change increases garbage collection (GC) pressure and causes jank in the main thread.

📊 Impact: Reduces intermediate O(N) memory allocations during marker batch operations to O(1) extra space complexity, improving rendering frame rates during map viewport interactions.

🔬 Measurement: Profile the React application using Chrome DevTools Performance tab while rapidly panning the map with tourism markers enabled; memory allocation spikes and minor GC pauses should be noticeably reduced.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 7651686478409747793 started by @ClarusIubar

Refactored `useNaverTourismMarkers.ts` to replace multiple chained `.map()`, `.filter()`, and spread `[...arr]` operations with single-pass `for...of` loops. This avoids creating unnecessary intermediate arrays and significantly reduces garbage collection pressure during tight React render/effect loops when manipulating the Naver Map viewport markers.

Co-authored-by: ClarusIubar <101549899+ClarusIubar@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@ClarusIubar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

정리 근거: 이 PR은 Bolt/Jules 자동 성능 최적화 계열입니다. 현재 열린 PR들이 useNaverTourismMarkers allocation/GC 또는 TourismInfoSheet mapping 미세 최적화로 중복되어 있고, 다수 PR에 .jules/bolt.md, lockfile 노이즈, 자동 생성 메타가 포함되어 있습니다. 측정 가능한 병목/아키텍처 경계/회귀 테스트 없이 그대로 병합하면 가독성 저하와 회귀 위험이 더 큽니다. 유효한 아이디어가 필요하면 별도 목적형 이슈/브랜치에서 원본 구조에 맞춰 선별 재구현하겠습니다. 이 PR 자체는 병합하지 않고 close합니다.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant